GnS Economics Newsletter

GnS Economics Newsletter

Share this post

GnS Economics Newsletter
GnS Economics Newsletter
Weekly Forecasts 14/2024
Weekly Forecasts

Weekly Forecasts 14/2024

Coronavirus experiment, market liquidity update and global recession

Tuomas Malinen's avatar
Tuomas Malinen
Dec 06, 2024
∙ Paid
1

Share this post

GnS Economics Newsletter
GnS Economics Newsletter
Weekly Forecasts 14/2024
Share

Forecasts:

  1. The aftermath of the “Coronavirus-pandemic”. (Free)

  2. Market liquidity update.

  3. Global recession update, part I.

The aftermath of the “Coronavirus-pandemic”

We were among the first to warn on the consequences of the “pandemic” to the world economy and global markets, in late January 2020. We especially warned on the risk of a collapse of the financial markets and depression of the world economy. The first one of these came to be in March 2020, leading to the market bailouts by central bankers, most notably by Jerome Powell and the Federal Reserve.1 The bailout of the world economy became a little later through a gargantuan fiscal stimulus programs run across the globe. Together these operations led to the inflation shock, on which we warned in March 2021.

There’s now credible evidence that the 2019-nCov, the official name issued to the coronavirus by the World Health Organization at the early stages of the ‘pandemic’, was released from a lab, possibly on purpose. We first identified the virus as a Black Swan, that is, a high impact improbable event. Now, in the wake of the 520-page report, and two years of investigation, by the U.S. House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic, we need to acknowledge the possibility that the virus and the response to it, were pre-planned, as the report indicates. That is, they served a certain purpose, which remains mostly hidden. To the vast majority of global populace, the “Coronavirus experiment” naturally came as a shock, i.e., a Black Swan.

Tuomas first strongly pushed for the lockdown policies in Finland (in late-February and early-March 2020), but turned as their unwavering critic after the horrible costs started to unravel during the Summer of 2020. He kept fighting against the measures for two years, for example, questioning the constitutionality of the restriction measures enacted by the Finnish government led by (then) Prime Minister Sanna Marin.

The main issues with the measures enacted to suppress the viral infection were two. First, they were global, which indicates central-control (or at least central-guidance) and, secondly, they were ineffective and destructive to the general populace.

The general populace was subjected to heavy propaganda operations across the globe since around the Summer of 2020.2 In the U.S. alone, these operations incurred a cost of nearly a billion dollars. The aim, according to the House report on U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, was to increase the covid vaccine uptake. Because the campaign did not match reality, it lead to the collapse of public trust in public health institutions in the U.S.

Team of Japanese researchers issued a dire-warning regarding the Corona vaccinations: “Compared to those who are unvaccinated, the mortality rate is 5X higher if you get vaccinated twice. We cannot continue these mRNA vaccines.” Reports of high excess mortality rates to, e.g., cardiopulmonary arrests, have also been pouring in. Some utterly horrible public accounts also stand in testimony of the sinister nature of the vaccines. The effects of lockdowns to schooling and learning of students during the Covid era have been very detrimental, but the most worrying thing is that these detrimental developments are expected to pass on to future cohorts till at least the 2030s. The economic cost has also been massive, including the inflation crisis and heavily bloated public balance sheets.

Some researchers suggest that there never even was a “pandemic”. Some politicians have even been giving statements that the Corona-experiment was a military operation implicating NATO. In any case, authorities are now secretly and silently rolling off the special permits to use the vaccine. What can we deduct from all of this?

As usual, we will present a worst-case scenario, which implies that the Coronavirus experiment was a preparation for further Black Swan events to come. We conclude that, in the worst-case, the Coronavirus experiment was a pre-planned operation conducted:

  1. To poison a vast majority of the global populace with the vaccine in an effort to decrease the population and to establish other (sinister) aims, which are currently unknown.

  2. To undermine constitutions to a point, where an “emergency” declared autocratically by the political establishment, can be used to strip people from their constitutional rights and persecute without a due legal process.

These imply that the Coronavirus-experiment was a preparation for medical/economic/military emergencies in the future, aimed at:

  1. Reducing the global populace.

  2. Establishing global control mechanisms.

In our Special Report on the Great Reset, we envisaged a Global Authoritarianism (worst-case) scenario, which described the possible motives of the elite to create authoritarian (global) control mechanisms:

In this highly disturbing scenario, we assume that the GR agenda is driven by malevolent motives towards the global enslavement of people.

The psychological context of such a scenario rises from the context that ultra-wealthy people, with no interest in money anymore, conspire to take control of the globe—conceivably under to pretext to “save it” economically, politically and environmentally. Some would be playing power games, while others might be involved through altruistic motives of “saving the planet”, etc., which have just taken a very sinister turn. While this may sound far-fetched, recent developments explained above force us to consider also such a dystopian scenario.

The point is that we cannot rule out the possibility of a global elite conspiring to establish an authoritarian rule over the entirety of global populace. Moreover, in his Apocalypse Scenario III, The Horsemen of the Apocalypse, Tuomas noted that:

Famine, in combination with wars, naturally would lead to Death, but we can also speculate further. A growing body of evidence points to the lab in Wuhan as the origin for the Coronavirus. The aim of the group-over-groups could also be to unleash a much deadlier virus, that is, to create an actual modern plague. The aim could also be to start WWIII, which would bring utter devastation, as it would most likely, eventually be fought with nuclear weapons.

What would be the aim of such Biblical plights? To crush the will of the people, because if that happens, people turn into easily controllable ‘robots’ or ‘zombies’. This is the way to ultimate control. I am having trouble imaging to what other purpose all this craziness could be aimed at? Every single element from the “climate emergency” to central bank digital currencies lead in the same direction; removing our freedoms and pushing us back into slavery. People will not yield into this, unless their will has been crushed.

If the above holds true, it implies that the Coronavirus experiment was a preparation for much darker events to come. It also implies that the nature of future events depend crucially on how thoroughly we are able to root out the global elite and the ‘group-over-groups’ (etc.) from our democratic system during the upcoming four years (essentially the Trump Presidency). In any case, the Coronavirus-experiment indicates that we have to be prepared for cataclysmic Black Swan events in the coming years.

Global liquidity update

Keep reading with a 7-day free trial

Subscribe to GnS Economics Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Tuomas Malinen
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share