There’s also the possibility that the liabilities of the bank, like deposits and bonds, could be used to re-capitalize the bank (this may be the main option under Swiss law). This would constitute as an option #4.
However, it would likely to lead to a increased contagion, where investors would try to get rid of all bank debt, because they would risk losing it in a “bail-in” if the bank fails (and because no one would know which bank would be next). This would lead to increasing stress in the interbank markets and into deepening crisis. This is why we think this option will be avoided, if possible.
The next few days will be crucial.
Disclaimer:
The information contained herein is current as at the date of this entry. The information presented here is considered reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. Changes may occur in the circumstances after the date of this entry and the information contained in this post may not hold true in the future.
No information contained in this entry should be construed as investment advice. Readers should always consult their own personal financial or investment advisor before making any investment decision, and readers using this post do so solely at their own risk. Readers must make an independent assessment of the risks involved and of the legal, tax, business, financial or other consequences of their actions. GnS Economics nor Tuomas Malinen cannot be held i) responsible for any decision taken, act or omission; or ii) liable for damages caused by such measures.
"The next few days will be crucial."
Yeah, we'll see. Two questions I'm thinking just now. Is it actually too big in order to save? And how much stuff could safely hide under the lid? BR JKi